An alternative to sham?
For reasons I discussed in another post, research on whether acu “works” is bedevilled by the difficullty of finding a control procedure that doesn’t actually do anything. A different approach to the testing of treatments is to use patients as their own controls. This is not often done but it remains a possibility. The idea is to study individuals with long-term symptoms and compare what happens when they are receiving treatment to when they are not. In a paper titled “Patients as their own controls in studies of therapeutic efficacy: Can we trust the results of non-randomized trials?”, Noel S. Weiss and Susan R. Heckbert (Journal of General Internal Medicine July 1988, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 381–383) endorsed its utility.
This approach has the potential to provide a valid measure of efficacy if the condition being treated is chronic, if the effect of the therapy given prior to the first evaluation of patient status does not linger into the second period of the study, and if the means by which the evaluation of patient status is performed at the two points in time are comparable.
I want to describe a case of this kind. The patient is myself so I can’t claim any kind of objectivity, but I think the long period of observation makes it interesting. Anyway, for what it’s worth, here it is.
Over a period of about ten years I’ve had repeated episodes of pain in my legs. They occur for no obvious reason at intervals of about four to six months. They can be on either side although I’ve never had them on both sides at once.
The pain begins mildly and intermittently in the front of the thigh. After a couple of days it becomes more severe and tends to move to the outer (lateral) side of the thigh and radiates down to the side of the knee. It isn’t continuous but comes and goes throughout the day in cycles lasting about 40 to 60 minutes. There is no back pain. No movements or muscle stretching make it either better or worse, although it is if anything better while I’m working. It is usually worse at night. In intensity it reaches about 7 on a 10-point scale. It is relieved by paracetamol.
Response to acupuncture
Throughout the years I tried numerous acupuncture treatments. I sought for muscle tripper points in all the muscles in the region and found none, but anyway I needled the muscles (including tensor fasciae latae, which was suggested by two people). I needled locally in the painful areas. I tried general (central) needling at LR3 (interspace between first and second metatarsals). None of these made any difference.
After about seven years of this I pretty much gave up trying to treat the pain and simply waited for it to go away by itself, which it always did, though I was afraid that one day it would remain permanently. Then, during quite a bad episode, it occurred to me one evening that the one acupuncture technique I hadn’t tried was periosteal (bone) needling. This is a technique I find to be effective for joint pain and also radiating pain either from the or the pelvis, but for some reason I hadn’t thought of it in my own case.
So I tried needling the hip bone (ilium). In anatomical terms this was about a thumb’s breadth below the iliac crest and about three fingerbreadths behind the anterior iliac spine. (There is no need to be particularly fussy about exactly where periosteal acupuncture is done provided it’s anatomically safe.) To my considerable surprise the pain receded and disappeared over about ten minutes, exactly as it I’d taken paracetamol. I slept peacefully throughout the night and was still pain-free next morning. There was a slight recurrence the next evening; I repeated the treatment and the whole episode then ceased, much sooner than it was expected to do.
Subsequently I’ve had further episodes, all of which have responded to periosteal needling. It seems to be best to carry this out at the earliest moment, as soon as I notice any symptoms. The problem has now remained completely under control for about three years.
The usual critics’ response to claims for acupuncture is that the response is due to the placebo effect. Leaving aside the consideration that the placebo effect, however it works, has to be a nervous system response (what else could it be?), I find it unlikely in this case. I’d been trying acupuncture for my problem over at least seven years without once getting any response and I certainly didn’t expect one to the periosteal approach, so I was genuinely surprised when it happened.
Incidentally, I don’t congratulate myself for having thought of this treatment. On the contrary, I think I was remarkably obtuse for not having tried it sooner.